Customer service on the ground usually involves human
beings, and human beings are not perfect. While we are justifiably upset when
we are confronted with surly agents or less-than-helpful sales people, there
often will be factors, perhaps beyond their control, that have contributed to
their attitude at the time we encounter them. Aware that we too have moments of
less-than-kind behaviour toward others, we can and probably should forgive
them.
However, when it is a particularly egregious or systemic
failure, due to lack of proper training or adequate supervision, for example,
or—far worse—the deliberate policy of a company’s customer service that results
in our discomfort, inconvenience, or loss of value for dollars spent, we do not
have to—indeed we should not—accept such failure or such a policy and thereby allow
the company to forget or to ignore the fact that it is we the customers who keep
that company in business, keep its employees in jobs, and keep shareholders in
healthy dividends and other investment returns.
I would be dishonest if I claimed that I do not care about
the level of compensation I receive for abysmal customer service, but I would
willingly give up all compensation in return for the believable assurance from
the company that it cared enough about me as a customer, and about customer
service generally, to implement, maintain, and monitor the effectiveness of a
long-term policy which will result in allowing me—and everyone else who
patronizes the organization—to confidently expect to be treated with the
respect, courtesy, and care due a customer regardless of the amount of money I
have spent or might spend.
But no company that fails to provide a consistently
satisfactory level of customer service is going to change if it is not in its
financial interest to do so. Corporations that rely on the consumer for their
bread and butter are also aware that they have, over a period of sixty years or
more, trained us to become insatiably materialistic. As long as we covet the
products or services they offer, we will allow them to have their way with us;
greed trumps human dignity in a consumer society.
We might say, then, that there is in fact a kind of unspoken
compact between corporations and consumers: we love the goods and services that
companies offer, so we put up with generally low levels of service and often substandard
product quality. But it is not the aim of large companies simply to maintain
existing profits; the impetus is always toward increasing them; after all,
shareholders are greedy too. This drive to squeeze more and more out of the
market is not a campaign without collateral damage, it seems to me, because it
necessarily involves raising prices and cutting costs, impacting the ordinary
individual through both downward pressure on wages and on employment in general
(one of the most common complaints in the yelp reviews of the department store
cited above was the difficulty customers had in finding someone in the store to
assist them) and reductions in customer service, either policy-driven or as a
result of under-staffing.
So we have become, in a sense, enslaved to the corporations
because of the lust they have awakened in us for the products they put on the
market. How many of us still use the iPods we paid premium dollars for just a
few years ago? Or the iPod docking stations? Do we really believe that the
technology for the iPhone that is the newest object of our desire did not exist
prior to the release of the iPod? Is the technology of the iPhone 5 really brand
new? If we already have a smart phone that allows us to make calls, send and
receive text messages and e-mails, surf the Internet, and take photos, why do
we want to stand in line for hours, even days, to purchase the latest version? And
let’s take a look at our cell phone bills over the past couple of years and
notice how much they have increased and then ponder whether the increases are
coincidental.
In the yelp reviews of the department store mentioned above
the positive comments were almost exclusively about the availability of lines
of desirable products in the store; the reviewers did not appear to care about
the difficulty of obtaining assistance or the surly attitude of sales staff. It
is no wonder, then, that the incident that I found so shocking could have taken
place.
We have made the Apple Corporation the richest company on
earth. One wonders if the workers in the plants that manufacture Apple products
or the employees in the Apple stores that sell them or the consumers all over
the world who purchase these products, often going deeper into debt to do so,
have been invited to share in the obscene wealth of the corporation.
It is time to give our heads a bit of a shake and recognize
our complicity in what is happening in the world: the growing gap between the
small number of people with great wealth and the so-called 99 percent, the
general decline in quality and service, increasing personal debt, not to
mention the environmental damage that has been caused by our blind rush to possess
the latest of everything.
Congratulations on being named one of the 66 very best blogs by LGBT Christians in the entire world. Hope that all is well with you. Peace and blessings. Mark
ReplyDeleteThank you, Mark. I was not aware I had been accorded such an honour. (Are there actually more than 66 blogs by LGBT Christians in the world? LOL)
Delete"So we have become, in a sense, enslaved to the corporations because of the lust they have awakened in us for the products they put on the market."
ReplyDeleteI think this is exactly so. I recently took a course on Love and the professor had us all read 1984. One thing I never really grapsed about that book the first time around (in highschool) was that the book was really about love. An Orwellian society is actually about the manipulation of eros, about achieving unprecedented levels of control not by brute or external force, but my modifying what we love and controlling us through our own desires, dreams and memories.
In this sense, the "lust" that you speak of that we have for products should really concern us. Society needs spirituality now more than ever as a reflective practice on desire: what is it, where is it coming from, where is it leading to. In my opinion.